The Use of Glenoid Structural Allografts for Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary and revision implant is increasing. Advances in implant design and preoperative surgical planning allow the management of complex glenoid defects. As the demand for treating severe bone loss increases, custom allograft composites are needed to match the premorbid anatomy. Baseplate composite structural allografts are used in patients with eccentric and centric defects to restore the glenoid joint line. Preserving bone stock is important in younger patients where a revision surgery is expected. The aim of this article is to present the assessment, planning, and indications of femoral head allografting for bony defects of the glenoid. Methods: The preoperative surgical planning and the surgical technique to execute the plan with a baseplate composite graft are detailed. The preliminary clinical and radiological results of 29 shoulders which have undergone this graft planning and surgical technique are discussed. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue score of pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Constant-Murley score (CS), satisfaction before and after operation, and active range of motion. Radiological outcomes included graft healing and presence of osteolysis or loosening. Results: The use of composite grafts in this series has shown excellent clinical outcomes, with an overall graft complication rate in complex bone loss cases of 8%. Conclusion: Femoral head structural allografting is a valid and viable surgical option for glenoid bone defects in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

All-arthroscopic supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle advancement leads to high healing rate and excellent outcomes in patients with massive, retracted rotator cuff tears, even in patients with pseudoparalysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique involving muscle advancement and double-layer lasso loop (DLLL) repair for massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients with massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears who underwent the all-arthroscopic muscle advancement technique from March 2017 to September 2021, with minimum follow-up of 12 months. Key steps included suprascapular nerve release, advancement of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, and DLLL repair. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, active range of motion (ROM), and strength were compared. Preoperative and postoperative structural radiological characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: Forty-three shoulders in 38 patients were evaluated with mean follow-up of 18.8 months (range 12-55 months). Of the 43 shoulders, 4 repairs failed (9.3% retear rate). VAS, ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores significantly improved (p<0.001) in patients who demonstrated healing on postoperative MRI (n=39). ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores were significantly better in the healed group, with 100% exceeding MCIDs for ASES and UCLA scores, and 84.2% for Constant score. A lower proportion of patients in the retear group achieved MCIDs. Active ROM in all planes significantly improved for those who had healed repairs. (p<0.001). Relative strengths of abduction, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus were at least 90% of the contralateral side. Recovery rate of pseudoparalysis (7 patients) was 100%. CONCLUSION: All-arthroscopic muscle advancement, coupled with double-layer lasso loop repair, leads to a high healing rate with excellent clinical outcomes and recovery of strength to at least 90%, even in patients with pseudoparalysis.

Trustworthy deep learning framework for the detection of abnormalities in X-ray shoulder images.

Musculoskeletal conditions affect an estimated 1.7 billion people worldwide, causing intense pain and disability. These conditions lead to 30 million emergency room visits yearly, and the numbers are only increasing. However, diagnosing musculoskeletal issues can be challenging, especially in emergencies where quick decisions are necessary. Deep learning (DL) has shown promise in various medical applications. However, previous methods had poor performance and a lack of transparency in detecting shoulder abnormalities on X-ray images due to a lack of training data and better representation of features. This often resulted in overfitting, poor generalisation, and potential bias in decision-making. To address these issues, a new trustworthy DL framework has been proposed to detect shoulder abnormalities (such as fractures, deformities, and arthritis) using X-ray images. The framework consists of two parts: same-domain transfer learning (TL) to mitigate imageNet mismatch and feature fusion to reduce error rates and improve trust in the final result. Same-domain TL involves training pre-trained models on a large number of labelled X-ray images from various body parts and fine-tuning them on the target dataset of shoulder X-ray images. Feature fusion combines the extracted features with seven DL models to train several ML classifiers. The proposed framework achieved an excellent accuracy rate of 99.2%, F1Score of 99.2%, and Cohen's kappa of 98.5%. Furthermore, the accuracy of the results was validated using three visualisation tools, including gradient-based class activation heat map (Grad CAM), activation visualisation, and locally interpretable model-independent explanations (LIME). The proposed framework outperformed previous DL methods and three orthopaedic surgeons invited to classify the test set, who obtained an average accuracy of 79.1%. The proposed framework has proven effective and robust, improving generalisation and increasing trust in the final results.

Does forearm referencing using a retroversion guide achieve the targeted retroversion of the humeral component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Component positioning affects clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, which necessitates an implantation technique that is reproducible, consistent, and reliable. This study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of positioning the humeral component in planned retroversion using a forearm referencing guide. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 54 patients (27 males and 27 females) who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy were evaluated. A standardized surgical technique was used to place the humeral stem in 15° of retroversion. Version was assessed intraoperatively visualizing the retroversion guide from above and referencing the forearm axis. Metal subtraction techniques from postoperative computed tomography images allowed for the generation of 3D models of the humerus and for evaluation of the humeral component position. Anatomical humeral plane and implant planes were defined and the retroversion 3D angle between identified planes was recorded for each patient. Accuracy and precision were assessed. A subgroup analysis evaluated differences between male and female patients. RESULTS: The humeral retroversion angle ranged from 0.9° to 22.8°. The majority (81%) of the measurements were less than 15°. Mean retroversion angle (±SD) was 9.9° ± 5.8° (95% CI 8.4°-11.5°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -34% ± 38 (95% CI -23 to -44). In the male subgroup (n = 27, range 3.8°-22.5°), the mean retroversion angle was 11.9° ± 5.4° (95% CI 9.8°-14.1°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -21% ± 36 (95% CI -6 to -35). In the female subgroup (n = 27, range 0.9°-22.8°), mean retroversion angle was 8.0° ± 5.5° (95% CI 5.8°-10.1°) and the mean percent error with respect to 15° was -47% ± 36 (95% CI -32 to -61). The differences between the 2 gender groups were statistically significant (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Referencing the forearm using an extramedullary forearm referencing system to position the humeral stem in a desired retroversion is neither accurate nor precise. There is a nonnegligible tendency to achieve a lower retroversion than planned, and the error is more marked in females.

Modified cerclage and suture mesh fixation for comminuted patellar fracture - "Cobweb Technique": A case report.

Displaced comminuted patellar fractures necessitate surgical treatment to restore the function of the extensor mechanism of the knee. One of the main challenges in the fixation of comminuted fracture of the patella is achieving an anatomic articular reduction with a stable fixation to allow early mobilization and prevent knee stiffness. Various common surgical fixation methods necessitate the use of metallic implants. Due to its superficial location, hardware-related complications and re-operations are common after patellar fixation. We present a case of a comminuted patellar fracture fixed using a modified cerclage and suture mesh fixation technique using high-strength braided nonabsorbable sutures. This provided a rigid fixation that allowed early range of motion while avoiding the risk of having symptomatic hardware.

Restoration of glenoid joint line: a three-dimensional analysis of scapular landmarks.

Background: Restoration of the glenoid joint line in shoulder arthroplasty is important for implant positioning and function. Medialization of the glenohumeral joint line due to glenoid bone loss is commonly encountered in primary and revision of shoulder arthroplasty albeit the direction and location of bone loss varies with different pathology. Three-Dimensional (3D) planning software has assisted in preoperative planning of complex glenoid deformities. However, limited literature is available defining a reliable 3D method to evaluate the glenoid joint line preoperatively. Aims: The purpose of this study is to identify a set of reliable scapular landmarks to be used as reference points to measure the premorbid glenoid joint line using 3D segmented models of healthy scapulae. Methods: Bilateral computed tomography scans from 79 patients eligible for primary stabilization procedures were retrospectively selected from our institutional surgical database (mean age 35 ± 10 years, 58 males and 21 females). 3D models of the contralateral healthy scapulae were created via computed tomography scan segmentation using Mimics 24.0 software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Anatomical landmarks were identified using 3-Matic 16.0 software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). The distance between identified landmarks and a sagittal plane created on the deepest point of the glenoid was recorded for each scapula and reliability of each landmark was assessed. Inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were also evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Four landmarks showed statistically significant results: the scapular notch (SN), the centroid of the coracoid (CC), a point on the most medial border of the scapula in line with the scapular spine (TS), and the most lateral point of the acromion (AL). The mean (± standard deviation) joint line measured from the SN, CC, TS and AL were 28.36 ± 2.97 mm, 11.66 ± 2.07 mm, 107.52 ± 8.1 mm, and 29.72 ± 4.46 mm, respectively. Inter-observer reliability analysis for SN, TS, and AL showed excellent agreement with ICC values of 0.966, 0.997, and 0.944, respectively, and moderate agreement for CC with ICC of 0.728. Conclusion: The results from this study assist in estimating joint line medialization preoperatively and in planning its subsequent restoration. A set of reliable landmarks can be used as references to estimate the premorbid glenoid joint line preoperatively.

Outcomes and survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: current concepts.

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been the gold standard of care for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. Outcomes are varied and have been affected by both patient and implant characteristics. Patient factors, such as age, preoperative diagnosis, and preoperative glenoid morphology, can affect the outcomes after TSA. Similarly, the different glenoid and humeral component designs significantly affect the survivorship of TSA. Significant evolution has occurred in the design of the glenoid component with the aim of decreasing the glenoid-sided causes of failure in TSA. On the other hand, focus on the humeral component has been increasing as well, with a trend towards using shorter humeral stems. This article aims to look at the outcomes of TSA as affected by the various patient characteristics and design options for the glenoid and the humeral components. This review also aims to compare survivorship data from global literature and the Australian joint replacement registry and to provide insights into the implant combination that may provide the best patient outcome.

Single-Stage Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative Planning, Surgical Technique, and Mixed Reality Execution.

Revision shoulder arthroplasty is increasing with the number of primary shoulder replacements rising globally. Complex primary and revisions of shoulder arthroplasties pose specific challenges for the surgeon, which must be addressed preoperatively and intraoperatively. This article aimed to present strategies for the management of revision of shoulder arthroplasties through a single-stage approach. Preoperatively, patient factors, such as age, comorbidities, and bone quality, should be considered. The use of planning software can aid in accurately evaluating implants in situ and predict bony anatomy that will remain after explantation during the revision surgery. The planning from such software can then be executed with the help of mixed reality technology to allow accurate implant placement. Single-stage revision is performed in two steps (debridement as first step, implantation and reconstruction as the second step), guided by the following principles: adequate debridement while preserving key soft tissue attachments (i.e., rotator cuff, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, deltoid), restoration of glenoid joint line using bone grafting, restoration of humeral length, reconstruction and/or reattachment of soft tissues, and strict compliance with the postoperative antibiotic regimen. Preliminary results of single-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty show improvement in patient outcomes (mean 1 year), successful treatment of infection for those diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infection, and improved cost-benefit parameters for the healthcare system.

Frozen Shoulder 360° Release.

Arthroscopic capsular release has emerged as a safe and reliable method for treating severe frozen shoulder in patients with significant loss of range of motion. This article describes a reproducible technique for arthroscopic 360° release of the shoulder performed in the lateral decubitus position.

Computed tomographic evaluation of glenoid joint line restoration with glenoid bone grafting and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with significant glenoid bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of native glenohumeral joint line is important for a successful outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The aims of this study were to quantify the restoration of glenoid joint line after structural bone grafting and RSA, and to evaluate graft incorporation, correction of glenoid version, and rate of notching. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 21 patients who underwent RSA (20 primary, 1 revision) with glenoid bone grafting (15 autografts, 6 allografts). Grammont design implants and baseplate with long peg were used in all patients. Preoperative and postoperative 3D models were created using MIMICS 21.0. Preoperative defects were classified, and postoperative joint line restoration was assessed based on the lateral aspect of the base of the coracoid. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were evaluated for graft incorporation, version correction, and presence of notching. RESULTS: Preoperative glenoid defects were classified as massive (5%), large (29%), moderate (52%), and small (14%). The average preoperative version was 8° of retroversion. The average postoperative version was 5° of retroversion. The average preoperative medialization was noted to be 8.4 mm medial to native joint line or 0.6 mm (range -16.8 to 13.2) lateral to the coracoid base. The postoperative CT scans demonstrated a mean joint line at 12.1 mm (range 1.3-22.4) lateral to the coracoid base. At the 3-month follow-up, all patients demonstrated graft incorporation on CT scans. Graft osteolysis was observed on CT scan in 4.8% of patients at a mean follow-up of 19.5 months. DISCUSSION: Structural bone grafting of glenoid defect effectively re-creates the glenoid anatomy, restores glenoid bone stock, re-creates the true glenohumeral joint line, and corrects glenoid deformity. The use of bone grafting also allows lateralization of the baseplate and glenosphere, reducing the risk of severe scapular notching. CONCLUSION: Restoration of the glenoid joint line was achieved in all patients. Glenoid bone grafting is a viable option for restoring glenoid joint line in cases of significant glenoid defects encountered during RSA.